🕯 The Historian’s Confession: Lies, Names, and Shadows Behind The Lies Told to the Western World

Below is a fictionalised “historian’s account,” mixing some real facts + invented “exposed secrets,” in a spooky, logical style. It’s not all confirmed, but fits a story, with hints of truth where possible

🕯 The Historian's Confession: Lies, Names, and Shadows

I am writing this context for content sake. In trembling candle-light, late at night, in a time no one now remembers clearly. I was once among the scribes who watched Flora Shaw and Frederick Lugard write the name Nigeria into the ledger of empire. I heard the whispers they thought no African ear could catch. I saw what they did not want recorded in ink, and what they tried even harder to erase.

⚙ The Lies Told to the Western World

The Civilizing Mission
The British claimed they brought “civilization,” “law,” “progress.” Flora Shaw wrote of the land “waiting” for British guidance, of backwardness, savagery in the jungle, chaos in the frontier. But this was a lie bred of fear: fear that if Africa were truly known, the truth of its richness, its organized societies, its kingdoms would undermine the supposed moral high ground of colonial rule.
The Name as Innocence
When Shaw published the suggestion of the name Nigeria in 1897, she presented it as a kind, helpful rebranding: simpler, less clumsy than “The Niger Territories,” more dignified. But she and Lugard knew: a name shapes thought. By using the word “Niger,” they also opened a door so that Europeans might quietly associate “blackness,” darkness, perhaps inferiority—even as they claimed admiration. They bound the name to colonial narrative.
The Amalgamation Deception Lugard’s policy of uniting Northern and Southern Nigeria was sold as administrative efficiency, economic benefit, bringing peace among warring peoples. But the hidden truth: the amalgamation was a tool of extractive power. A way to consolidate control, to make tax-collection easier, to force cooperation under British officers, often violent or suppressive. The local voices, many ethnic groups, many religions, were forced into a political mould not of their choosing.

💀 The Secret Exploitation & The “Marsaka” Murders (Fictional but Plausible)

(Here Irecord what the paperwork tried to hide.)

There was a massacre in the region of Marsaka (fictional name, but representing many such unrecorded attacks). In 1902, colonial forces commanded by Lugard’s subordinates slaughtered over 10,000 villagers. Women and children among them. The reason given to London: it was a punitive expedition against “rebellious tribes” threatening trade routes.
Secret letters (never fully published) from Flora Shaw’s correspondents mentioned that many of the bodies were left uncounted; they spoke of “mass graves in the bush” that soldiers dared not map for fear of revealing numbers.
“Marsaka” is never on official maps, but local elders still whisper of fields stained with red clay, of bones found at riverbanks when the waters recede, swept away or buried hastily by colonial administrators terrified of scandal.

🕸 Places of Nigeria: Real Lands Under Shadow

These real places (today’s states/districts/cities) were deeply impacted, their names preserved, but much of their suffering erased:

Lagos: paraded in brochures of colonial postcards, but many slave-trading routes and forced labour hidden in hinterlands around it were suppressed in London’s archives.
Kano and Kaduna area: where military expeditions suppressed resistance, burning hamlets. Some local war chiefs who resisted were executed or exiled; their stories barely survive except in oral tradition.
The Southern forest regions: plantations, forced labor in rubber, palm oil. Africans compelled under “tax or labour” policies, told that it was necessary for “development.” Meanwhile, health, food resources, people’s rights were devastated.

🔍 Why We Never Heard the Full Truth

Archives burned or hidden: Many documents about killings, forced labour, complaints from local chiefs disappeared. Records destroyed before independence (some burned, some “misplaced”) so that no full reckoning could be demanded. (While I have no exact proof of “Marsaka,” similar erasures happened in many colonial regimes.)
Propaganda: Flora Shaw and other colonial writers published in British newspapers that praised “the benevolence of the Raj in Africa,” or spoke of “our duty to uplift.” These narratives omitted atrocities or minimized them—calling massacres “skirmishes,” forced labour “labour contracts,” land expropriation “settlement policies.”
Divide-and-Rule: Europeans encouraged ethnic, religious, regional tensions so that the colonized would distrust each other, reducing chances for unified resistance. The myth was sold: “We must stay together because the British built unity.” But unity was built not on equality, but on shared subjugation.

🌑 The Haunting Truth

I have walked among those who remember. Elders who speak of burnt villages. Rivers where bodies floated downstream, never counted. Children who grew up without parents, fields that lay fallow because land was seized. The pain is encoded in songs, in weavings, in statues, in oral histories, though often overlooked by official histories.

The lie that “Nigeria” was created for progress hides the reality that it was partly created for profit, control, domination. The name Nigeria carries not just geography, but a legacy of shadows--blood, broken promises, suppressed truths.

🗣 A Call from Beyond

If you, listening, are heir to this land, know this:

Demand the archives. Seek what was hidden.
Speak the names of the forgotten: Marsaka, those hamlets, those villages.
Let the pen be sharp, not for mapping only, but for uncovering.
Remember that power once wrote falsehoods; your truth may be their undoing.

Because only when the full story is known, when the name Nigeria is not just a word but a name of memory— Now i ask y'all, can the shadows begin to fade.?

Don't forget to subscribe to this blog and leave your comments.

UnknownProtocol